Aural Memory and the Assumption of Structure

On the subject of ~1st century aural memory (ability to remember a speech), I came across an interesting passage in Theon's "Exercises". 

"In listening (akroasis), the most important thing is to give frank and friendly attention to the speaker." Then the student should recall the subject of the writing, identify the main points and the arrangement, finally recall also the better passages. If at first he cannot recall the words or their arrangement, it is still useful for him to try, but not everything at once. Have him write it down at leisure. Begin with the prooemion [introduction], and then, after practicing with that for several days, continue to the narration, then move on to the arguments, two or three at a time. (bolding added)1

There are three points that I find interesting from this quote. (The following point is a minor one) Firstly, I find the systematic advice for listening demonstrative that structure was an expected quality of ~1st century (and prior) writing/speeches. In other words, structure was just as important and fundamental for ancient compositions as it is now. While this is not surprising for many of us, I have heard comments which sometimes put ancient people into a category which almost don't need structure.  

Secondly and most importantly, writing was seen as a helpful memory/training tool for listening skills. In other words, their aural memory was not so refined that it did not need the help of writing. This sort of background is helpful in holding realistic opinions about oral tradition and its associated methods used for memory. We also don't see in this quote a dichotomy, which is easy to create, of oral vs. literary culture; but, rather, we see a blending of the two "cultures". 

Thirdly, I find the quote helpful in realistically understanding 1st century aural memory. Here, Theon talks about taking several days in remembering just the prooemion (introduction) alone. Obviously, this is light on details about the size of the prooemion and the time spent each day doing this. Also, this is instruction for kids. Nonetheless, it reveals that their abilities were not superhuman in the aural department as some make it sound like.  

Lastly, while this information is helpful, care needs to be taken in simply reading this type of information back into the NT because we are reading a Greco-Roman text and not a more Jewish source. Nonetheless, texts like this help us get a better image of the NT world.

   

1. Kennedy, George, Progymnasmata: Greek Textbooks of Prose Composition and Rhetoric (Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature, 2003), p. 69.

Honorable and Dishonorable Professions

I came across the following material the other day while reading Culpepper's commentary on Mark. It was a quote from the Midrash on the honor/dishonor of different professions. Here is the quote:

Abba Goryom, from Zadyan, said [in the name of Abba Guryah], "A person should not bring up his children to be ass or camel drivers, barbers, mariners, shepherds, or shopkeepers, for these are not honest trades." 12 R. Jehudah says [in the name of Abba Guryah], "Most of the ass drivers are wicked persons, but the greater part of the camel drivers are generally honest; most mariners are pious; the best of physicians is destined for hell, 13 and the best butcher is a suitable companion for Amalek." 14 R. Nahorai saith, "I leave every business, and have my son only taught the Holy Law, for its rewards are partly enjoyed here, but the principal reward is reserved, to those who occupy themselves therein, in the future world. It is not thus with other [worldly] trades, for when a man engaged in them becomes ill, or old, or suffers from other woes, and cannot longer work at them, he must perish of hunger. (Midrash 4.14)1

So from this, we get an understanding of later (than the NT) attitudes toward a number of professions (some of which are mentioned in the NT). Whether these attitudes were around in Jesus' time is questionable. As a side note, care must be taken in reading this material back into the NT as the material post-dates it. Nonetheless, the attitudes are more likely to be reflective of attitudes in Jesus' time than our attitudes (eg. our hierarchy of what is and what is not a dishonorable profession). 


From this data, I derived the following list of dishonorable professions: 

1. Ass/Camel driver
2. Barber
3. Mariner
4. Shepherd  
5. Shopkeeper
6. Physicians (destined for hell/gehenna)
7. Butcher (companion for Amalek)

However, some of these professions were seen as honorable by some and these are:

1. Camel drivers (generally honest)
2. Mariners (most are pious)

In this list of dishonorable professions, being a student of Torah is seen as not just  honorable but the most honorable.  

1. http://www.sacred-texts.com/jud/etm/etm148.htm#fr_1140

An Interesting Proverb

Theon, in airing his frustrations about people debating without appropriate training, recorded the following proverb as an illustration of such behaviour,

"learning pottery-making by starting with a big jar" (The Exercises of Aelius Theon) 1

I like it.

1. Kennedy, George, Progymnasmata: Greek Textbooks of Prose Composition and Rhetoric (Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature, 2003), p. 3.

A Loss of Interest in Philosophy

I am often frustrated about the lack of interest in philosophy even amongst the 'intelligentsia' and academics. However, I have learnt that this isn't a new phenomena. Theon, in "The Exercises of Aelius Theon" (~1st A.D.), wrote,

"The ancient rhetoricians...did not think one should come to rhetoric at all before grasping philosophy... Now, however, most students are so far from appreciating such studies that they rush into public speaking without even getting a knowledge of what are called general studies [grammar, arithmetic, geometry, etc]..." (The Exercises of Aelius Theon) 1

From the perspective of the 1st century, it is interesting to note that there appears to have been a loss of interest in philosophy. Well, this is at least true within Theon's socio-cultural environment.

1. Kennedy, George, Progymnasmata: Greek Textbooks of Prose Composition and Rhetoric (Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature, 2003), p. 3.